The “Oh, Really?” Factor
October 25, 2012
“Obama…an Empty Chair? Or an Empty Lectern?”
I want to add another perspective to those of John Bean (Sept. 22) and Ron Smith (Sept. 29) in calling for everyone to put aside party loyalties and vote to end “intrusions” by the federal government now directed by Obama.
The American people aren't fools. That’s why Romney has surged ahead in most polls.
Obama runs as corrupt an Administration as ever, with wall-to-wall conflicts of interest, cover-ups of terrorist attacks on
It is no coincidence that the Libyan ambassador’s murder by terrorists was the first since the days of Jimmy Carter, another well-meaning president who had no idea what he was doing.
A high school friend in New York City has been “apolitical”
for “almost all” her life, but thought electing Obama would “show the world
that we’re not racist.” Surrounded by a
“blue state,” it was easy to vote for him. But she watched his Administration
closely and was shocked to find no “hope and change”—instead, “partisan
gridlock” and “incompetence from every Democrat official.”
Many partisans point to
the Constitution, but don’t know the history. It was never about perfection—not
even mentioning slavery. It sought "agreement" on important founding principles
from people with diverse backgrounds and philosophies. The Bill of Rights
was added later only because James Madison and Thomas Jefferson were
corresponding in 1787 while Jefferson was in France .
"Political
parties" arose around that effort to get the Constitution approved.
Alexander Hamilton's northeastern "faction" became known as
"Federalists," and Jefferson ’s
followers in the agrarian South eventually were known as
"republicans" with a small R.
What makes the U.S. different
is, we are not founded around a single religion or a single ethnicity—just a
broad "idea" about personal freedom. That’s why the world beats a
path to our door.
That original founding
generation of 75-100 flawed men who shaped our key documents were among the top
political thinkers the world has known (especially Madison ). Even as they fought about policy and
engaged in personal attacks, they always put their country first.
Nowadays, "party"
comes first, and radicals and extremists on both sides only kick the can down
the road, without any real effort to compromise.
The Confederate
Constitution of 1861 had the right idea—it allowed just one six-year term for
president. If you look at "second terms" from 1789 forward, practically
all have been substantive failures, just as first terms were about getting re-elected.
“If” Obama could have
solved problems as he promised, would anyone really care if he is Democrat or
Republican? I agree with my New York
friend that he’s in over his head, as are the people around him, and I’m not
even sure he's a U.S.
citizen.
By contrast, (except for
not having “sex with that woman, Miss Lewinsky”) Bill Clinton and GOP Speaker
of the House Newt Gingrich did a good job together as "administrators"
for America .
With Newt’s assistance, Clinton
left the country a budget surplus, and I agree with those who say George W.
Bush squandered it.
Now it’s important for members
of both parties to understand—like Bean and Smith do—that our citizens’ mainline
conservatism demands smaller, less intrusive government at every level, less
spending on “stuff” people don’t want, allowing people to keep more of their earnings
to be spent on “freedom.” Private capitalism should be allowed to work its
magic.
Like our founders and
Clinton, we need to look for more political “partners,” and avoid becoming beholden
to so many “partisans.”
Dennis A. Benfield